Analysis of Conformity and Group Influence in Twelve Angry Men.
Director Sidney Lumet’s eminent film 12 Angry Men offers an inside perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of the American judicial system. This magnificently written and intensely effective courtroom film surrounds the case of a fictitious, teen “criminal” who faces the death penalty.Essays on 12 Angry Men A Film Analysis of 12 Angry Men, a Film Directed by Sidney Lumet. The Hidden Messages in 12 Angry Men, a Film Directed by Sidney Lumet. The delicate balance of seeking for justice. The Errors and Gaps in the Criminal Justice System in the Film 12 Angry Men. Analysis of.Essay: 12 Angry Men Analysis. Gentlemen of the jury, I would like to point out to you three pieces of evidence that prove this young boy is innocent. I would like to review purchase of the knife, the old man hearing a yell, and the movie theatre.
Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA 321 Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men. All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence.In the viewing of 12 Angry Men, we get an excellent example of how cooperative communities can be formed among diverse and divergent worldviews. It is significant to identify the exact manner in which Henry Fonda (the 8th Juror) formed a cooperative community within the vastly different worldviews present in the deliberation process.
Conclusion “Twelve Angry Men” not only highlights the fragility of justice, but also the flaws of human nature. We would think that twelve men, though with different backgrounds but with a seemingly good grasp of the situation and sound minds, would come together and provide a fair and just verdict.
